Head-to-head · free
Procter & Gamble vs Toyota Motor Corporation
PG vs TM — return on capital, cash generation, margins and balance sheet side by side.
PG
5 / 5
measures where PG leads
TM
0 / 5
measures where TM leads
A simple count of which company scores better on each measure — not a recommendation to buy or sell.
| Measure | PG · FY2026 | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $87.0B | — |
| Net income | $16.0B | — |
| Revenue growth (yearly, multi-year) | 2.1% | — |
| Free cash flow | $15.1B | — |
| Free cash flow margin | 17.4% | — |
| Net cash / (debt) | — | — |
| ROIC | 17.5% | 3.6% |
| Return on equity | 30.1% | 10.1% |
| Gross margin | 50.2% | 16.7% |
| Operating margin | 22.7% | 7.4% |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.06x | 4.84x |
Figures are as reported by each company; latest fiscal year shown.
Where Procter & Gamble's cash went (FY2026)
- Capital spending
- $4.4B
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
- Acquisitions
- —
- Net debt issued / (repaid)
- —
Ask which business is stronger
"Which one reinvests at higher returns?" "Who carries more risk in its filings?" Get answers drawn straight from both companies' filings.
Compare them free