Head-to-head · free
GSAT vs Procter & Gamble
GSAT vs PG — return on capital, cash generation, margins and balance sheet side by side.
GSAT
3 / 7
measures where GSAT leads
PG
4 / 7
measures where PG leads
A simple count of which company scores better on each measure — not a recommendation to buy or sell.
| Measure | GSAT · FY2025 | PG · FY2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.0M | $87.0B |
| Net income | (8.7M) | $16.0B |
| Revenue growth (yearly, multi-year) | 21.7% | 2.1% |
| Free cash flow | — | $15.1B |
| Free cash flow margin | — | 17.4% |
| Net cash / (debt) | — | — |
| ROIC | — | 17.5% |
| Return on equity | -5.4% | 30.1% |
| Gross margin | 64.8% | 50.2% |
| Operating margin | 5.4% | 22.7% |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.38x | 1.06x |
Figures are as reported by each company; latest fiscal year shown.
Where GSAT's cash went (FY2025)
- Capital spending
- —
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
- Acquisitions
- —
- Net debt issued / (repaid)
- —
Where Procter & Gamble's cash went (FY2026)
- Capital spending
- $4.4B
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
- Acquisitions
- —
- Net debt issued / (repaid)
- —
Ask which business is stronger
"Which one reinvests at higher returns?" "Who carries more risk in its filings?" Get answers drawn straight from both companies' filings.
Compare them free