Head-to-head · free
Peabody Energy vs Warrior Met Coal
BTU vs HCC — return on capital, cash generation, margins and balance sheet side by side.
BTU
2 / 4
measures where BTU leads
HCC
2 / 4
measures where HCC leads
A simple count of which company scores better on each measure — not a recommendation to buy or sell.
| Measure | BTU · FY2025 | HCC · FY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | — |
| Net income | — | $57.0M |
| Revenue growth (yearly, multi-year) | 3.9% | — |
| Free cash flow | (77.7M) | — |
| Free cash flow margin | -2.0% | — |
| Net cash / (debt) | — | — |
| ROIC | — | — |
| Return on equity | -1.5% | 2.7% |
| Gross margin | 13.6% | 8.5% |
| Operating margin | -0.1% | 3.5% |
| Net debt / EBITDA | -0.78x | -0.62x |
Figures are as reported by each company; latest fiscal year shown.
Where Peabody Energy's cash went (FY2025)
- Capital spending
- $411.4M
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
- Acquisitions
- —
- Net debt issued / (repaid)
- —
Where Warrior Met Coal's cash went (FY2025)
- Capital spending
- —
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
- Acquisitions
- —
- Net debt issued / (repaid)
- —
Ask which business is stronger
"Which one reinvests at higher returns?" "Who carries more risk in its filings?" Get answers drawn straight from both companies' filings.
Compare them free