Head-to-head · free
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. vs Peabody Energy
AMR vs BTU — return on capital, cash generation, margins and balance sheet side by side.
AMR
1 / 6
measures where AMR leads
BTU
5 / 6
measures where BTU leads
A simple count of which company scores better on each measure — not a recommendation to buy or sell.
| Measure | AMR · FY2025 | BTU · FY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $3.9B |
| Net income | (61.7M) | — |
| Revenue growth (yearly, multi-year) | -1.5% | 3.9% |
| Free cash flow | — | (77.7M) |
| Free cash flow margin | — | -2.0% |
| Net cash / (debt) | — | — |
| ROIC | — | — |
| Return on equity | -3.9% | -1.5% |
| Gross margin | 1.2% | 13.6% |
| Operating margin | -2.9% | -0.1% |
| Net debt / EBITDA | -2.97x | -0.78x |
Figures are as reported by each company; latest fiscal year shown.
Where Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.'s cash went (FY2025)
- Capital spending
- —
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
- Acquisitions
- —
- Net debt issued / (repaid)
- —
Where Peabody Energy's cash went (FY2025)
- Capital spending
- $411.4M
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
- Acquisitions
- —
- Net debt issued / (repaid)
- —
Ask which business is stronger
"Which one reinvests at higher returns?" "Who carries more risk in its filings?" Get answers drawn straight from both companies' filings.
Compare them free