Head-to-head · free

Alibaba Group Holding Limited vs Novo Nordisk

BABA vs NVO — return on capital, cash generation, margins and balance sheet side by side.

BABA

0 / 5

measures where BABA leads

NVO

5 / 5

measures where NVO leads

A simple count of which company scores better on each measure — not a recommendation to buy or sell.

MeasureBABA · FY2026NVO
Revenue$1.02T—
Net income$103.6B—
Revenue growth (yearly, multi-year)4.7%—
Free cash flow(50.7B)—
Free cash flow margin-5.0%—
Net cash / (debt)(86.1B)—
ROIC2.8%34.2%
Return on equity10.0%60.7%
Gross margin39.8%81.0%
Operating margin5.8%41.3%
Net debt / EBITDA1.32x0.67x

Figures are as reported by each company; latest fiscal year shown.

Where Alibaba Group Holding Limited's cash went (FY2026)

Capital spending
$126.9B
Buybacks
$7.6B
Dividends
$33.7B
Acquisitions
$12.1B
Net debt issued / (repaid)
$39.0B
Full BABA profile →

Where Novo Nordisk's cash went

Not reported yet.

Full NVO profile →

Ask which business is stronger

"Which one reinvests at higher returns?" "Who carries more risk in its filings?" Get answers drawn straight from both companies' filings.

Compare them free

More comparisons