Head-to-head · free

GSAT vs Monster Beverage

GSAT vs MNST — return on capital, cash generation, margins and balance sheet side by side.

GSAT

2 / 6

measures where GSAT leads

MNST

4 / 6

measures where MNST leads

A simple count of which company scores better on each measure — not a recommendation to buy or sell.

MeasureGSAT · FY2025MNST · FY2025
Revenue$273.0M$8.3B
Net income(8.7M)—
Revenue growth (yearly, multi-year)21.7%10.6%
Free cash flow—$2.0B
Free cash flow margin—23.7%
Net cash / (debt)——
ROIC—25.4%
Return on equity-5.4%26.8%
Gross margin64.8%55.8%
Operating margin5.4%29.2%
Net debt / EBITDA0.38x-0.82x

Figures are as reported by each company; latest fiscal year shown.

Where GSAT's cash went (FY2025)

Capital spending
—
Buybacks
—
Dividends
—
Acquisitions
—
Net debt issued / (repaid)
—
Full GSAT profile →

Where Monster Beverage's cash went (FY2025)

Capital spending
$132.3M
Buybacks
—
Dividends
—
Acquisitions
—
Net debt issued / (repaid)
—
Full MNST profile →

Ask which business is stronger

"Which one reinvests at higher returns?" "Who carries more risk in its filings?" Get answers drawn straight from both companies' filings.

Compare them free

More comparisons