Head-to-head · free
Clorox vs Restaurant Brands International Inc.
CLX vs QSR — return on capital, cash generation, margins and balance sheet side by side.
CLX
5 / 9
measures where CLX leads
QSR
4 / 9
measures where QSR leads
A simple count of which company scores better on each measure — not a recommendation to buy or sell.
| Measure | CLX · FY2025 | QSR · FY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1B | $9.4B |
| Net income | $810.0M | — |
| Revenue growth (yearly, multi-year) | 41.3% | 13.2% |
| Free cash flow | $761.0M | $1.4B |
| Free cash flow margin | 10.7% | 15.4% |
| Net cash / (debt) | — | — |
| ROIC | 14.8% | 7.5% |
| Return on equity | 285.6% | 23.0% |
| Gross margin | 42.3% | 33.8% |
| Operating margin | 13.2% | 26.4% |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.35x | 4.86x |
Figures are as reported by each company; latest fiscal year shown.
Where Clorox's cash went (FY2025)
- Capital spending
- $220.0M
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
- Acquisitions
- —
- Net debt issued / (repaid)
- —
Where Restaurant Brands International Inc.'s cash went (FY2025)
- Capital spending
- $265.0M
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- —
- Acquisitions
- —
- Net debt issued / (repaid)
- —
Ask which business is stronger
"Which one reinvests at higher returns?" "Who carries more risk in its filings?" Get answers drawn straight from both companies' filings.
Compare them free